Static v Dynamic alt="google logo variants.jpg" width="400" height="201" Banks: (On 'dynamic' that is to say multiple brand "The age of the static brand is coming to an end. Organisations, companies, institutions, even charities are realizing that having identity schemes that ‘flex’ and adapt to circumstances are more appropriate in the multi-channel, multi-lingual world that brands now Rain v. Trends in CTE: Rain Go (Beatles tribute band named RAIN sues Korean pop singer named Sam I Am Gives ABC Sitcom New (Seuss estate protests use of 'Sam I Am'; show name changed to "Samantha Be Thomas And The Tarnished Times (reg req): Lesson That Thomas Could (regarding the owner of the Thomas the Tank Engine property distancing itself from the toy We Charge Extra to Talk Dirty About alt="esquire jolie 07.jpg" width="113" height="159" while back the sex columnist from Esquire called me up to ask whether, in theory, a new sexual position could be protected. Well, let's see. A physical position probably couldn't be patented, although devices to enable the position could be. The idea of a new position couldn't be copyrighted, but, viewing a sexual position as analogous to or some fixation of the position, such as a book of diagrams, or a video, could be. As for trademark, the inventor could name the position and then merchandise column is out now in the July issue of Esquire (no online version available - I'll email it to you). Oddly, the column didn't contain the comprehensive discussion of intellectual property law that I thought was warranted, opting instead for an illustration of naked people. Well, whatever turns you Another Argument For A is the link to Clinton's Soprano parody It starts out well with a shot of a diner in Mt. Kisco near my old office. It then proceeds to refer to the final scene of the Sopranos (complete with cameo by Vince Curatola, the actor who played Johnny Sack), with Journey's 'Don't Stop Believing' playing through-out. I tried to have an argument with my M&S colleague Paul Fakler but couldn't, as we both agree as to the that there is no authorization (and we have no information one way or the other on that point), the Sopranos reference is most likely permissible and the use of the Journey song is not. Without doing a shot by shot analysis, it seems that the video only borrows common ideas also used by#tracking |
Alt A Alt B Alt C Alt D |